The battle is turn-based where the player selects a unit, an attack from the unit, and the targeted block (or, depending on the type of attack, the enemy unit). One unit fits into each plot, however there is a limit on how many units can be used for each battle. velociraptors, mammoths, lasers, swords, plasma, railguns, etc.).ĭepending on the type of battle, this could mean a 9-block plot (arranged 3x3) or a 13-block plot (first and second row have 5, third row has 3). Most of the technology in game is based on that used by humans during WW2, although there are a few exceptions (e.g. It is impossible to "lose" in Battle Nations: even if the player has no buildings to generate gold, the player will always have enough gold to build a supply drop, which generates 100 gold every hour as well as 25 of iron, wood, and stone. Building a productive nation allows players to form armies which are the basis for the game's core: PvP combat in turn-based strategy warfare. The game puts players in control of land with limited resources where effective management of resources is vital to expansion and advancement. The game was then re-released by community creators on in 2018 with development ongoing. On September 28, 2016, the game was officially shut down by Z2Live, along with many of their other titles. The final draft was considered by the IPCC for adoption/acceptance at its 49th Plenary Session in May 2019.Battle Nations is a freemium turn-based strategy multiplayer video game originally developed and published by Z2Live. The authors started drafting the 2019 Refinement at the First Lead Author Meeting in June 2017 in Bilbao, Spain. It should be used in conjunction with the 2006 IPCC Guidelines.įrom the 328 nominations received from governments, observer organizations and Bureau members, 190 experts were selected as Authors and Review Editors by the TFB in accordance with the Principles Governing IPCC Work. It will not replace the 2006 IPCC Guidelines. The 2019 Refinement was not to revise the 2006 IPCC Guidelines, but update, supplement and/or elaborate the 2006 IPCC Guidelines where gaps or out-of-date science have been identified. The overall aim is to provide an updated and sound scientific basis for supporting the preparation and continuous improvement of national GHG inventories. The decision also included a Draft Table of Contents (TOC) and “Terms of Reference for the production of a Methodology Report to refine the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories” (TOR).The title of the Methodology Report should be “2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories”.The format should be one single Methodology Report comprising an Overview Chapter and five volumes following the format of the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (2006 IPCC Guidelines).At this session, IPCC decided (Decision IPCC/XLIV-5) to prepare a Methodology Report with the following title and format: The conclusions of this Scoping Meeting were submitted to the IPCC for consideration at its 44th Session. Such refinement will help all UNFCCC Parties use good practice inventory methodologies based on up-to-date scientific knowledge.īased on the decision of the IPCC at its 43rd session in April 2016, a Scoping Meeting was held to prepare an outline of the Methodology Report to refine the 2006 IPCC Guidelines. updating default emission factors) has been recognized by TFB. Consequently, the necessity and usefulness of refining the current methodological guidance (e.g. The technical assessment revealed that there has been abundant new scientific and empirical knowledge published since 2006 which the IPCC should take into account, particularly with respect to data for emissions factor development for some categories and gases. The Co-Chairs’ summaries of these four meetings can be found below in the Supporting Documents section.
The 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (2006 IPCC Guidelines) provide a technically sound methodological basis of national greenhouse gas inventories, and therefore fundamental revision is unnecessary.The 26th Meeting of Task Force Bureau (TFB) (28 – 29 August 2014, Ottawa) concluded that:
0 kommentar(er)
